Who do you want to groom today?
Rest assured that I have been keeping track of Microsoft’s latest chatroom nonsense, after my entry about them changing their Messenger protocols for “security reasons”. It’s just so ridiculous and obvious, I’ve not been sure it’s worth bothering to mention. Yeah. Sure. Microsoft are closing chatrooms for the children. Nothing to do with money or kneejerk legal threats.
(I should mention at this point that I don’t really give a monkey’s about the chatrooms themselves personally. I don’t use that sort of crap. I generally hate public chatrooms, and would particularly hate ones with kids in.)
I’m somewhat disappointed that the various childrens’ charities are apparently so pleased about it, since the problem has nothing to do with chatrooms. (Quite apart from the fact that it’s yet to be indicated to me that “net enticement” is actually a significant problem, and not just a convenient way of ignoring the fact that actually, the vast majority of abused children are being abused by relatives and family friends.) If children are advertising for social contacts and engaging in social activity over the net then there will be paedophiles around, whatever the forum. They’ll hang around Livejournal, no shortage of gullible teenagers there. They’ll post on discussion boards. It won’t change anything. Moderated fora can help stop this, but there will always be private methods of communication. If parents are worried about this they need to control their children’s access to the net, full stop, there is no other way.
…but this is all so obvious, I feel like an idiot for even saying it in the first place…
I did come across this great quote from currybet.net, though. Gillian Kent, director of MSN UK, in a TV interview:
Most of the abuse has been happening in what are called free and unmoderated chat rooms
There are alternatives, much safer, such as Instant Messaging. And around the world we have 100 million people using Instant Messenger. That’s a great safe way of communicating. We encourage everybody to take up this new form rather than the older form of chats.
Well, if it’s being free and unmoderated that makes chatrooms dangerous, and MSN Messenger is safe, then what’s the difference? Could it perhaps be that MSN Messenger isn’t going to be free for too long? (It’s certainly not going to be moderated, that would be much more expensive than moderating the chatrooms, would stop everyone using it and would probably be illegal.) Or could this be yet another attempt to get everyone in the world to use MSN Messenger for all their kid-enticing needs? Are they trying to challenge Yahoo Groups’ position as Official Internet Paedophile Heaven?
Comments off



