Looking at the bills relating to the draft, which appears to be planned for Spring 2005, I see that I am exempt:
Congress brought twin bills, S. 89 and HR 163 forward this year, entitled the Universal National Service Act of 2003, “to provide for the common defense by requiring that all young persons [age 18--26] in the United States, including women, perform a period of military service or a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes.” These active bills currently sit in the committee on armed services.
Not exempt because I am not a citizen, you understand, but because I am not a young person. The above makes no mention of citizenship status and explicitly includes women. My dad told me the story of a friend of his who practiced as a doctor in the US during Vietnam and faced being drafted, even though he wasn’t a citizen; apparently he fled, reasonably enough, and had to negotiate after the war to be let back in.
There appears to be growing evidence that a draft is planned, something that falls under the category of “they’re not really going to do something that stupid, are they?” for me. A draft would be catastrophic domestically. If there’s a better way of saying “yes, this is a bit like Vietnam actually” I’m not sure what it is, and the number of people who actually believe invading Iraq has anything to do with defending the US (even if they’re not bothered enough about it to say anything) and are prepared to risk their lives over the issue is surely vanishingly small.
It’s all very well to argue the toss on the internet over whether deposing Hussein was a good idea for the region, but when it comes down to the question of getting your head blown off in Fallujah, the “global war on terror” becomes a lot less abstract.
Pollster: Do you support the President’s decision to send troops to Iraq?
Pollee: Sure, I guess, Saddam was a bad guy, right?
Pollster: So you’d be quite happy about being drafted then? They’re coming to this area next, I hear.
Pollee: Hell no! Where are the WMDs, Bush? No blood for oil!
I’ve been saying “they’ll never do that, it would be so incredibly unpopular it could bring down the government” for a while but I have to face the fact that it appears that they are seriously considering doing it. It’s not like things are going to get better for the US in Iraq in the near future, and it’s not like the US is really going to leave and never come back, certainly not if Bush wins and quite possibly not if Kerry wins either.
I don’t know, I was making the prediction based on the issue of political self-interest, judging that I could rely on that being of primary importance. I really don’t see how a draft could be justified to the public, that justification believed and mass civil unrest not be the result. I can see how they thought that they could get away with invading Iraq, risky but potentially very profitable, and they still might – wouldn’t be the first unprovoked war of aggression that’s been painted as a “police action” in even the last couple of decades. Or the second. Or the third. But the draft as well?
Still, I’m sure they won’t attack Iran or Syria. That would be crazy. They’d never do that.
-
P.S. I like that last clause in the quote: “in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes“. So you can’t get out of it by saying “well, I wouldn’t mind if this was to defend the nation, but it isn’t, is it?” In fact, if you were drafted into the 2nd Ann Coulter Brigade for the express purpose of executing all liberals for treason, you wouldn’t be able to do a damn thing about it.
-
P.P.S. Confirmation that, were I to be of the right age, I’d be subject to the draft on this page, second paragraph. Though I imagine I would fail an examination for “mental, physical and moral fitness”, given that I am a baby-eating prevert who believes in dope, guns and fucking on the streets.
-
See this entry for a little clarification on the above link.